Home  News  Events  Album  Links  Contact
Main Menu
Search
Events
2006-03-08: Women in Robotics, Human Science and Technology (3)-3
Poster Mihoko Otake  Registed 2006-01-11 18:36 (3801 hits)

Date: 2006.3.8 (Wed) 14:30-15:00
Speaker: Maria Gini
Author: Maria Gini, Jan Pearce, and Karen Sutherland
Title: Using the Sony AIBOs to increase diversity in Undergraduate CS programs
Keywords: Undergraduate CS curriculum, Sony AIBO, women in CS
Type: Organized Session

Affiliation: AIRVL, University of Minnesota
Position: Professor
Collaborators: Jan Pearce, Berea College; Karen Sutherland, Augsburg College
Disciplines: Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence, Multi-Agent Systems
Societies and Conferences: ACM, AAAI, IEEE Robotics Society, Intelligent Autonomous Systems Society

Bibliography: Maria Gini, Jane Pearce, and Karen Sutherland, “Using the Sony AIBOs to increase diversity in Undergraduate CS programs”, Intelligent Autonomous Systems 9 T. Arai et al. (Eds.), IOS Press, pp.1033--1040, 2006.

Abstract:
We describe a proposed approach to increase diversity in undergraduate Computer Science programs and to encourage undergraduates majoring in fields such as health professions, business, art, and education to take more computer science courses. The approach is centered around using the Sony robot dogs AIBO in the classroom, starting at the very beginning of the computer science curriculum, as a tool to attract a diverse population of students to Computer Science, to introduce them to fundamental concepts in computing, and to give them an appreciation of the importance of becoming competent with technology.

References:
[1] http://www.activrobots.com, 2004.
[2] A. Beck and A. Katcher. “Between pets and people.” Purdue University Press, 1996.
[3] S. Beyer, K. Rynes, J. Perrault, K. Hay, and S. Haller. “Gender differences in computer science students.” In Proc. of the 36th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 49-53, 2003.
[4] D. Blank, L. Meeden, and D. Kumar. “Python robotics: An environment for exploring robotics beyond Legos.” In Computer Science Education Conference (SIGCSE), 2002.
[5] T. Camp. “The incredible shrinking pipeline.” Comm. of the ACM, 40(10):103110, Oct. 1997.
[6] J. M. Cohoon. “Recruiting and retaining women in undergraduate computing majors.” In Proc. of the 36th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 48-52, 2002.
[7] A. P. Danyluk. “Using robotics to motivate learning in an AI course for non-majors.” In Accessible Hands-on Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Education, AAAI Spring Symposium, 2005.
[8] R. Felder, G. Felder, and E. Dietz. “The Effects of personality type on engineering student performance and attitudes.” Journal of Engineering Education, 91(1):3-17, 2002.
[9] A. Fisher, J. Margolis, and F. Miller. “Undergraduate women in computer science: Experience, motivation, and culture.” In Proc. SIGSCE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 106-110, Feb. 1997. Published in SIGSCE Bulletin, Vol. 29, N. 1, March 1997.
[10] S. E. Fox. “Using robotics to introduce AI topics to a wider audience.” In Accessible Hands-on Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Education, AAAI Spring Symposium, 2005.
[11] B. Friedman, P. H. J. Kahn, and J. Hagman. “Hardware companions? what online AIBO discussion forums reveal about the human-robotic relationship.” In CHI, 2003.
[12] C. Frieze and L. Blum. “Building an effective computer science student organization: The Carnegie Mellon Women@SCS action plan.” SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(2), June 2002.
[13] M. Fujita. “AIBO: Towards the era of digital creatures.” International Journal of Robotics Research, 20(10):781-794, Oct. 2001.
[14] O. N. Garcia and R. Giles. “Research foundations for improving the representation of underrepresented minorities in the information technology workforce.” June 2000. www.cise.nsf.gov/itminorities/it_minorities_onal_report.pdf.
[15] C. Gilligan. “In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development.” Harvard University Press, 1982.
[16] W. Haliburton. “Gender differences in personality components of computer science students: A test of Holland's congruence hypothesis.” In Proc. SIGSCE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 77-81, Feb. 1998. Published in SIGSCE Bulletin, Vol. 30, N. 1, March 1998.
[17] http://www.k-team.com/robots/khepera/, 2004.
[18] M. Klawe. “Blue skies ahead for it jobs.” CIO Magazine, Dec 1, 2005.
[19] M. Koch. “No girls allowed!!” Technos Quarterly, 3(3), Fall 1994.
[20] D. Kumar and L. Meeden. “A robot laboratory for teaching Artificial Intelligence.” In D. Joyce, editor, Proc. of the 29th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM Press, 1998.
[21] M. Mannix. “Getting IT right.” Prism, pages 15-20, Mar. 2001.
[22] J. Margolis and A. Fisher. “Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing.” MIT Press, 2002.
[23] G. F. Melson, P. H. Kahn, A. M. Beck, B. Friedman, T. Roberts, and E. Garrett”Robots as dogs? children's interactions with the robotic dog AIBO and a live Australian shepherd.” In CHI, pages 1649-1652, 2005.
[24] D. P. Miller. “Using robotics to teach computer programming and AI concepts to engineering students.” In Accessible Hands-on Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Education, AAAI Spring Symposium, 2005.
[25] R. Murphy. Introduction to AI Robotics. MIT Press, 2000.
[26] Adviser, teacher, role model, friend: On being a mentor to students in science and engineering. National Academy Press, 1997.
[27] Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2004, 2004.
[28] Trends in educational equity for girls and women. National Center for Education Statistics, 2004.
[29] M. Prince. “Does active learning work? a review of the research.” Journal of Engineering Education, pages 223-231, July 2004.
[30] M. G. Sackrowitz. “An unlevel playing field: Women in the introductory computer science courses.” In Proc. SIGSCE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 37-41, Feb. 1996. Published in SIGSCE Bulletin, Vol. 29, N. 1, March 1996.
[31] E. Spertus. “Why are there so few female computer scientists?” Technical Report 1315, MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Aug. 1991.
[32] V. Valian. Why So Slow? The Advancement of Women. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998.
[33] L. L. Werner, B. Hanks, C. McDowell, H. Bullock, and J. Fernald. “Want to increase retention of your female students?” Computing Research News, 17(2), March 2005.
[34] L. Williams and R. R. Kessler.”All I really need to know about pair programming I learned in kindergarten.” Communications of the ACM, May 2000.
Copyright (C) 2005-, Women in Robotics Towards Human Science, Technology and Society. All right reserved.